|
Modern War was a difficult title to follow up. Therefore in that sense World at War is a little lacking to one of the best first person shooters, at least in my opinion. That is why I do not truly see this as a follow up, especially since Modern War 2...
|
|
|
Call of Duty: World at War is another great game in the series. The look and feel of World War II is all around you when you play this game. The new engine from Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare brings a new beginning to the series with harder and faster...
|
|
|
I am the type of gamer that is very selective when it comes to the games that I consider “quality.” I am the majority when I say this. It’s taken a while, but now developers and publishers have a good handle on what makes a game “Buy Worthy” these d...
Stellar Call of Duty immersion, Unmatched Multiplayer experience, Great replay value...
Standard FPS issues, getting stuck in blind spots, etc, If you don’t like linear track based shooters COD might not be your thing, Kiefer’s voice gets annoying in Multiplayer...
|
|
|
Gamers aren't a very open minded bunch it seems. From the moment Activision announced that Treyarch, the development studio behind Call of Duty 3, was working on Call of Duty: World at War the game couldn't get a break. Whatever the press saw and repor...
Nonstop action, Stunning presentation, Feature rich online modes, Going back to WWII will be tricky for some...
|
|
|
Call of Duty: World at War has arrived and if you’re like me you may have been surprised and perhaps even disappointed to learn that Treyarch was taking us back in history to WWII, especially after how well received Modern Warfare was last year, but r...
|
|
|
Call of Duty: World at War is a solid entry to the franchise, offering some pretty intense gameplay and nice new online features. However, the return to WWII means that it feels like a game you’ve played before.
|
|
|
Last year, Infinity Wards Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was quickly hailed as an instant classic and one of the finest examples of the first-person shooter genre. Everyone figured that it would be a while before we saw another Call of Duty title, bu...
Same intense action you know and love; impressive visuals and lighting; cooperative adds a ton of replay value; multiplayer still excellent.
Storyline is weak; flamethrower is tough to use on tougher difficulties; enemy AI can be absent-minded.
Last year, Infinity Wards Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was quickly hailed as an instant classic and one of the finest examples of the first-person shooter genre. Everyone figured that it would be a while before we saw another Call of Duty title, but...
|
|
|
For all the talk about how first-person shooters have milked World War II dry, the conflict's sheer battlefield variety and tactical scope make it a natural home for the genre. World at War doesn't innovate with quite the ambitious vigor of Call of Dut...
Phenomenal multiplayer; outstanding graphics and sound; varied enemies and locales; intense scripted action.
Short and somewhat uneven campaign; Allied AI is a bit stunted; some checkpoint placement quibbles. Previous Page Prev Next Page Next 1 2...
|
|
|
Just when I thought I was out...they pulled me back in.When Activision announced it was returning to World War II for the next chapter of the Call of Duty series, a collective groan could be heard around the world. CoD 4 was one of the best games relea...
Coop mode is a great addition, Multiplayer is still king, Gorgeous visuals, Incredible set pieces...
Not everyone will be thrilled that it is WWII, Campaign is a bit short...
|
|
gaming-age.com Updated: 2014-01-19 04:55:35
|
It's easy to come into Call of Duty: World at War with some concerns before you even sit down to actually play it. Why are we back in World War 2? Why isn't Infinity Ward working on this one? If it's using the CoD4 engine, is it pretty much just a comp...
|
|